devirt.re
Create account
Menu

Devirt vs manual reverse engineering

Keep the investigation.
Delegate the recovery.

Your research question is the valuable part. Decide how much of your time should go into reconstructing protected logic before you can investigate it.

Same binary.
Different division of work.

Devirt and manual reverse engineering: workflow responsibilities and deliverables
The questionManual reverse engineeringDevirt
Getting startedSet up your analysis environment and choose the recovery approach.Submit an authorized binary, select an output, and agree the scope.
Doing the recoveryYou operate the tools, reconstruct behavior, and resolve the difficult paths.The service handles eligible known-family recovery. Unfamiliar builds begin with an assessment.
Checking the resultYou design the checks and retain the evidence behind your conclusions.The output includes a coverage ledger and proof summary, with assumptions and unresolved checks.
Returning to your toolsYou create your own database, code, annotations, or report.Select an IDA database, annotated C, a full report, LLVM IR, or structured JSON.
When the file changesYou repeat or adapt your analysis and compare the versions.Professional plans include comparisons of versions you submit, while the previous result remains available.

Devirt describes the agreed service deliverable, not a guarantee for every build. Eligibility, complexity, and proof scope are assessed separately.

A handoff you can automate.

Step through submission, status, and delivery. This local teaching example shows the API handoff, not a live analysis or a replacement for your judgment.

POST/api/v1/submitBearer ••••
202 / Example responsequeued
job_id
demo_001
status
queued
progress
0%
Your evidence packageAvailable after successful completion

Keep this job ID.

The accepted scope and funding determine when processing starts. Every later request refers to the same job.

Local simulation, not a live API request. No file is uploaded and no credit is used.

A useful choice.
Not a universal winner.

Choose manual work when the investigation is the experiment.

Learning a protection scheme, changing hypotheses quickly, or keeping the file entirely in your own environment can make direct analysis the right choice.

Choose Devirt when recovery is the work blocking your next question.

A defined deliverable, repeated intake, and evidence packaged with the result let your team focus on interpretation, triage, and the finding itself.

Create an account for assessment

Does Devirt replace my debugger or disassembler?

No. The IDA database and LLVM IR options are designed to return the work to your tools. Your interpretation and any further investigation remain yours.

Can manual tools automate parts of the work?

Yes. Manual work can include scripts and sophisticated automation. The distinction is who builds, runs, maintains, and validates that workflow.

Manual work can include automation: Ghidra’s official project describes disassembly, decompilation and scripting. A capable tool and a completed analysis are different purchases.

Choose the work you want back.

Start with the output you need. If the architecture or scope is unfamiliar, begin with a free assessment.

Create your workspace

Create an account, verify your email and upload your file. We review custom work and email your scope and quote.

Create account

Find the right plan